Wednesday, October 30, 2019

The trend in economic growth of a country Coursework

The trend in economic growth of a country - Coursework Example This essay discusses that throughout history there have been many studies on economic growth. Overall economic growth of a country is measured every year by the difference that has occurred in GDP over the previous year. Should we consider that a country grows only by analyzing the monetary value of the production of final goods and services during a period? In researcher’s opinion would have no sense not to consider the benefit that provides a trained workforce, or the economic stability of a country. To reinforce this idea the researcher will investigate past developments on this theory. Mincer elaborated a study about the relationships of the individual’s earnings as variable dependent in age, experience and education. Mincer considers that the benefits of education to the people can be extrapolated to countries. Considers that an educated workforce directly affects the growth of a country. He justifies that an extra year of education in a white man who did not work on a farm contributes a extra seven per cent of profit. Adam Smith was the first person that found some link between International Trade and Economic Growth. The work of Grossman and Helpman and Rivera-Batiz and Romer has also aided to clarify why the participation of a country in an integrated world economy can stimulate its growth. Oil production and exports affect economic growth. Limiting the supply of oil to a country can cause serious economic consequences. We must highlight the oil crisis of 1973 or the current threat from Iraq to the European Union countries to limit its supply. In relation to the political unrest, the IMF warned in its 60 years that a lack of political stability could affect economic growth.Regarding the number of murders; the current Mexican central bank governor Agustin Cartens (2011) said that violence inhibited economic growth. The model To begin with, we need to find the relationship between the dependent variables and independent variable (growth). Th e initial econometric model of the of this study is: y = ?0+ ?1(GRDP)+ ?2(TRADEHARE)+ ?3(YEARSSCHOOL)+ ?4(ASSASINATIONS)+ ?5(REV_COUPS)+?. Some of the coefficients are expected to negative because some of the figures of variables are greater than the figures in dependant variable. From the SPSS output table below us can note that there is a negative relationship between growth and rgdp60 as well rev-coups. This means that other factors help to increase growth as they have positive coefficients’. Coefficients Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. Model B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) .490 .690 .710 .480 RGDP60 -4.693E-04 .000 -.622 -3.167 .002 TRADESHA 1.562 .758 .238 2.060 .044 YEARSSCH .575 .139 .770 4.126 .000 RECOUPS -2.158 1.110 -.256 -1.943 .057 ASSIS .354 .477 .092 .742 .461 a Dependent Variable: GROWTH The model econometric model of the of this study will be y= 0.49 -0.00047(GRDP) + 1.561696 (tradeshare)+ 0.575 (Yearsschool)+ 0.354 (assassinations ) -2.1575 (rev_coups)+? Goodness-of-Fit Chi-Square df Sig. Pearson 232.676 4032 1.000 Deviance 188.381 4032 1.000 Link function: Logit. The goodness –of-fit- statistics for model is 232.6 this means that the data obtained from the random sample is greater than 5 thus it does not fit into a specific pattern. Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .599 .359 .305 1.582084957 a Predictors:

Monday, October 28, 2019

Soft Drink and Market Share Essay Example for Free

Soft Drink and Market Share Essay Using the appropriate tools and processes taught in class, the group is required to develop business strategies for the organization. Guidelines below might help the group to prepare the written report. 1. Identify the firm’s existing vision and mission. Vision Statement 1. â€Å"To be the world’s best beverage company†. Being the best means providing outstanding quality, service, cleanliness and value, so that their every customer is contented and happy with their products†. 2. â€Å"To increase the value of their shareholder’s investment through sales growth, cost control and wise investment of resources†. Mision Statement 3. â€Å"To be the world’s premier consumer Products Company focused on convenient food and beverages. We seek to produce healthy financial rewards to our employees, our business partners and the communities in which we operate. And in everything we do, we strive for honesty, fairness and integrity†. 2. Develop vision and mission statement for the organization (if needed). 3. Identify the organization’s external opportunities and threats. External Opportunities and Threats a) Demographic Factors : †¢ Age †¢ Pepsi should target that age group that consumes it the most and make promotional strategies according to their behavior. So their main target is the young generation. †¢ Education †¢ A company has to make promotional strategies keeping in view the customer level. If the percentage of education is high in a country then through advertisements people can be made well aware of their product and can convey their message easily. Promotional and education has a direct relationship. b) Economic Factors : †¢ Economic Policies †¢ Some of the economic policies which can affect the market of Pepsico, it is a: 1. Fiscal Policy ? It is the policy of taxes. If heavy tax is levied on pepsi then its price will rise having negative affect on its consumption. 2. Monetary Policy ? Is made to restrict or increase the supply of money in the market. If the policies are made to restrict the flow of money in the market, inflation can be controlled hence increasing the real income of the people which will ultimately affect the consumtion of pepsi. 3. Price Policy ? If price of Pepsi is increased its demand will decrease and vice versa. 4. Income Policy ? If income of the people will increase their purchasing power will increase and hence increasing the market share of pepsi. c) Physical Factors : †¢ Region †¢ Marketing and sales of Pepsi is different in different geographical regions. In hot areas its demand is more. †¢ City size †¢ The cities which are densely populated the consumption of Pepsi is more. †¢ Climate †¢ Pepsi is more suitable for hot weathered countries. It is a source of refreshment when a person is thirty due to the hot weather. †¢ Infrastructure †¢ Roads are the basic need for transportation of Pepsi from one place to another. d) Technological Factors : †¢ Research and Development †¢ Through research and development quality of the product can be improved or better techniques or machinery can be developed which can increase the production. When technology experiences growth in their business. e) Political and Legal Factors : †¢ Laws Formulation †¢ Government has given copy right to Pepsico so that another company cannot sell their product by the name Pepsi. The countries where laws are formulated, the strategies and activities of the company are different. †¢ Social Responsibility †¢ Is to provide its customers with clean and hygienic products so to do this they have increased the use of disposable bottles. f) Social and Cultural Factors : †¢ Social Status †¢ Pepsi is a well renowned brand. People who are brand conscious will not drink beverages of lesser known brands. They will try to show their status by drinking Pepsi which is known to all as a quality drink. †¢ Media †¢ It is a very important factor for marketing. Media these days is a very effective can boast up sales to a great extent. g) Competitors †¢ Each of PepsiCo’s division has its close competitors. It has been observed that most of their competitors are single-product line companies, giving them a more direct handle of the industry. †¢ PepsiCo will have to compete with these strong competitors head on in order to maintain its market share. If PepsiCo is not careful enough, its competitors may eat its market share. h) Emerging health / environment †¢ More Consumers are starting to eat and live healthy, but as we can see majority of PepsiCo’s products are not healthy (junk food and soft drinks). 4. Construct an External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix. |EXTERNAL FACTOR ANALYSIS (EFE) MATRIX | |KEY EXTERNAL FACTORS |WEIGHT |RATING |WEIGHTED SCORE | |Opportunities | |Pepsico new products can easily penctrate in the market. |0. 10 |4 |0. 40 | |Noncarbonated drinks are the fastest-growing industry. |0. 12 |3 |0. 36 | |Demand of Pepsi is more than Competitor |0. 07 |3 |0. 21 | |Changing social trends (Fast Foods) |0. 09 |3 |0. 27 | |Internet promotion and ordering processes |0. 05 |1 |0. 05 | |May tie up or liaison with major showrooms, computer centre restaurant |0. 06 |2 |0. 22 | |Threats | |Non-Carbonated substitutes (The Mango Season) |0. 15 |3 |0. 45 | |Baverage industry is mature |0. 11 |4 |0. 44 | |Fake products (Imitators) |0. 09 |2 |0. 18 | |Competitor’s schemes |0. 04 |2 |0. 08 | |Strong competition with Coca-Cola company |0. 12 |2 |0. 24 | |TOTAL |1. 00 | |2. 90 | Assign rating between 1 to 4 for each key external factors : †¢ Poor Response 1 †¢ Average  Response 2 †¢ Above  Average  Response 3 †¢ Superior Respons – 4. 5. Identify the organization’s internal strengths and weaknesses. Internal Factors : Organizational Structure 1. Frito-Lay North America (FLNA) †¢ Frito-Lay North America manufactures, markets, sells and distributes salty and sweet snacks. Products manufactured and sold in North America include Lay’s and Ruffles brand potato chips, Doritos and Tostitos brand tortilla chips, Cheetos brand cheese-flavored snacks, Fritos brand corn chips, a variety of branded dips and salsas and Rold Gold brand pretzels. Low-fat and no-fat versions of several brands are also manufactured and sold in North America. 2. PepsiCo Beverages North America †¢ In recent years sales of non-carbonated beverages have grown steadily. 3. PepsiCo International †¢ Snack food businesses are growing fastest in the Asia pacific region si PI should give attention to these market to avail growth opportunity. †¢ Overall carbonated soft drink market has shown less than 1% growth over the past few years and all that growth is came from diet soft drinks and energy drinks. †¢ Consumer has shown an increasing interest in healthy alternatives to carbonated soft drinks, such as ready-to-drink teas, bottled water, sports drinks and juices. †¢ In 2004 more than one-third of PepsiCo’s sales came from spot (no trans fats) products. Internal Strengths †¢ Company Image : †¢ It also is a reputable and is well known all over world. Perception of producing a high quality product. †¢ Quality Conscious : †¢ They maintain a high quality as Pepsi Cola International collect sample from its different production facilities and send them for lab test in Tokyo. †¢ Good Relation with Franchise : †¢ Throughout its history it has a good relation with franchisers working in different areas of the world where they have the production facilities. †¢ Production Capacity : †¢ It has the highest production capacity in South Asia. †¢ Market Share : †¢ It has a highest market share †¢ Large no. of Diversity Business : †¢ This is also its main strength as it ahs diversity in many businesses such as : i. Pepsi beverages ii. Pepsi foods iii. Pepsi Restaurants. High Tech culture : †¢ The whole culture and business operating environment at Pepsi-Cola-West Asia has quick access to a centralized database an they use computers as business tools for analysis and quick decision making. Internal Weaknesses †¢ Decline in Taste : †¢ During the last years, it was published in Financial post that there has been big complaints from the customers with regard to the bad taste that they experienced during the span of six months. †¢ Political Franchises : †¢ Such as in Pakistan, Hamayun Ahkhtar is its franchisee who has a strong political support from a political party which is in opposition. In their era in government less taxes are imposed on them but relation increases as they come in opposition. So the selection is not appropriate as this thing is harmful to their image as well as the strategies. †¢ Short Term Approach : †¢ They have a lack of emphasis on this in their advertising such as currently when they losses the bid for official drink in the 96 cricket world cup. They started a campaign in which they highlight the factor such as â€Å"nothing official about it†. †¢ Weak Distribution : †¢ They lack behind in catering the rural areas and just concentrating in the urban areas. †¢ Low Consumer Knowledge : †¢ Unable to maximize local consumer knowledge. †¢ Lack of Soft Drink : †¢ Lack of soft drink â€Å"know-how† as a result of diversified business units and generalist managers. 6. Construct Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix. |INTERNAL FACTOR ANALYSIS (IFE) MATRIX | |KEY INTERNAL FACTORS |WEIGHT |RATING |WEIGHTED SCORE | |Strengths | |Strong multinational (Brand Equity) |0. 11 |3 |0. 33 | |Strong vast distribution Channels |0. 10 |4 |0. 40 | |Lack of capital constraints |0. 07 |3 |0. 21 | |Record market share |0. 10 |4 |0. 40 | |Strong brand portfolio |0. 05 |3 |0. 15 | |Aggressiveness in the market (market leader) |0. 06 |3 |0. 18 | |Brand promotion |0. 13 |4 |0. 52 | |Weakness | |Targeting only young customers |0. 10 |2 |0. 20 | |Political franchises |0. 07 |2 |0. 14 | |Centralized decision making |0. 05 |2 |0. 10 | |Decline in taste |0. 08 |1 |0. 08 | |Motivational factor |0. 05 |1 |0. 05 | |Not all products bear the company name |0. 03 |2 |0. 06 | |TOTAL |1. 00 | |2. 82 | Assign rating rate from 1 to 4 for each key internal factors : o Major weakness 1 o Minor weakness 2 o Minor strength 3 o Major strength 4 7. Prepare a Strenght-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) Matrix, Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix, Internal-External (IE) Matrix, Grand Strategy Matrix, and Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) as appropriate. †¢ Strenght-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) Matrix | |STRENGTHS |WEAKNESSES | | |Brand promotion |1. Decline in taste | | |Strong multinational (Brand Equity) |2. Targeting only young customers | | |Record market share |3. Not all products bear the | | |Strong vast distribution Channels |company name | | |Lack of capital constraints |4. Motivational factor | | |Aggressiveness in the market (Market Leader) |5. Political Franchises | | |Strong brand portfolio |6. Centralized decision making | |OPPORTUNITIES |S – O STRATEGIES |W – O STRATEGIES | |1. PepsiCo new products can easily |S1, S2, S3, O2, O3, O4 |W2, O2 | |penetrate in the market |Company can introduce new product or non- |By introducing non-carbonated drinks Pepsi| |2. Noncarbonated drinks are the fastest- |carbonated drinks because it have good brand |can capture different age groups. | |growing industry |equity, large resources | | |3. Changing social trends (Fast Food) |S4, O5, O3 | | |4. Demand of Pepsi is more than of |By having good distribution channel co. Can | | |Competitor |focus easily fast food restaurants, clubs. | | |5. May tie up or liaison with major |. | | |showrooms, computer centers restaurant | | | |6. Internet promotion ordering | | | |processes | | | |THREATS |S – T STRATEGIES |W – T STRATEGIES | |1. Non-carbonated substitutes (The |S4, S5, T1, T3 |W1, T3 | |Mango Season) |Because company has financial recourses and |By improving the taste quality company | |2. Fake products (Imitators) |distribution channel therefore it can produce|can reposition its products can take long | |3. Beverage industry is mature |non-carbonated drinks. |term position on maturity stage. | |4. Strong competition with Coca- | | | |Cola company | | |. †¢ Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix o Competitive Advantage ? Brand recognition- 3. 00 ? Large market share- 2. 00 -11. 00 = 2. 75 ? Wide distribution channel- 1. 00 4 ? Customer loyalty- 5. 00 11. 00 o Financial Strength ? Inventory turnover+ 7. 00 ? Return on asset+ 2. 00 + 12. 00 = + 4. 00 ? Net income+ 3. 00 3 + 12. 00 o Industrial Strength ? High industry growth rate+ 6. 00 ? Profit potential+ 4. 00 +15. 00= +3. 75 ? Financial stability+ 3. 00 4 ? Resource utilization+ 2. 00 + 15. 00 o Environmental Stability ? Economic stability- 2. 00 ? Barrier to entry- 1. 00- 7. 00 = 2. 33? Competitive pressure- 4. 00 3 7. 00 Coordinate –x ( CA + IS )= 2. 75 + ( + 3. 75) = + 1. 00 Coordinate – y ( FS + ES ) = 2. 33 + ( + 4. 00) = + 1. 67 |   | | | |Strong |Average |Weak | | |4. 0 |3. 0 |2. 0 |1. 0 | |The EFE Total Weighted | | | | | |Score | | | | | | |High |i |ii |iii | | |3. 0 | | | | | |Medium |iv |v |vi | | |2. 0 | | | | | |Low |vii |viii |ix | | |1. 0 | | | | IFE Score = 2. 82 EFE Score = 2. 90 ** At the v place = Hold Maintain †¢ Grand Strategy Matrix |RAPID MARKET GROWTH | |WEAK COMPETITIVE |Quadrant II |Quadrant I |STRONG COMPETITIVE. |POSITION | |market development |POSITION | | ||market penetration | | | | |product development | | | | |backward integration | | | | |forward integration | | | | |horizontal integration | | | | |related diversification | | | |Quadrant III |Quadrant IV | | |SLOW MARKET GROWTH | †¢ Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) as appropriate | |STRATEGIC ALTERNATIVES | |KEY FACTORS |WEIGHT |Non Carbonated product |Tie up with Resturants, | | | | |Clubs, Showrooms | |STRENGTHS | |AS |TAS |AS |TAS | |Strong multinational (brand equity) |0. 11 |3 |0. 33 |2 |0. 22 | |Strong vast distribution channels |0. 10 |2 |0. 20 |3 |0. 30 | |Lack of capital constraints |0.07 |4 |0. 28 |1 |0. 07. Record market share |0. 10 |1 |0. 10 |3 |0. 30 | |Strong brand portfolio |0. 05 |2 |0. 10 |3 |0. 15 | |Aggressiveness in the market (market leader) |0. 06 |3 |0. 18 |4 |0. 24 | |Brand promotion |0. 13 |2 |0. 26 |4 |0. 52 | |WEAKNESS | | | | | | |Targeting only young customers |0. 10 |3 |0. 30 |2 |0. 20 | |Political franchises |0. 07 |- |- |- |- | |Centralized decision making |0. 05 |- |- |- |- | |Decline in taste |0. 08 |3 |0. 64 |2 |0. 16 | |Motivational factor |0. 05 |1 |0. 05 |2 |0. 10 | |Not all products bear the company name |0. 03 |1 |0. 03 |3 |0. 09 | | |1. 00 | | | |. | | | | | | | | |OPPORTUNITY | | | | | | |New products can easily penetrate in the market |0. 10 |4 |0. 40 |1 |0. 10 | |Noncarbonated drinks are the fastest-growing industry |0. 12 |4 |0. 48 |3 |0. 36 | |Demand of pepsi is more than of competitor |0. 07 |2 |0. 14 |4 |0. 28 | |Changing social trends (fast foods) |0. 09 |2 |0. 18 |4 |0. 36 | |Internet promotion and ordering processes |0. 05 |2 |0. 10 |3 |0. 15 | |Tie up or liaison with major showrooms restaurant |0. 06 |1 |0. 06 |3 |0. 18 | |THREATS | | | | | | |Non-carbonated substitutes (the mango season) |0. 15 |4 |0. 60 |2 |0. 30 | |Baverage industry is mature |0. 11 |3 |0. 33 |2 |0. 22 | |Fake products (imitators) |0. 09 |1 |0. 09 |2 |0. 18 | |Competitor’s schemes |0. 04 |1 |0. 16 |3 |0. 12 | |Strong competition with Coca-Cola company |0. 12 |2 |0. 24 |3 |0. 36 | | |1. 00 | |5. 25 | |4. 96 | 8. Provide two recommendations for the organization i. e. , strategies. Support your recommendations. †¢ Out of the many strategic alternatives that PepsiCo could choose to follow, we have chosen to endorse one that fosters continued growth and diversification. Although their over-diversified portfolio has hindered their International Growth, these strategies strengthen their overall corporate worth and market presence domestically. †¢ As consultants for PepsiCo, we are making the following recommendations: 1. Pepsi should focus on increasing sales globally to compete effectively with Coke. They have been beaten badly in some markets, and need to focus more on un-tapped areas. 2. Continue to diversify their beverage selection through acquisitions. This will enable PepsiCo to combat the decreased interest in cola. Going along with this, PepsiCo needs to ensure that they can properly manage all of these acquired companies and should divest those that show limited potential.

Saturday, October 26, 2019

The Right To Privacy By Robert Bork. :: essays research papers

The Right to Privacy by Robert Bork. Robert Bork's The Right of Privacy examined the landmark case Griswald v. Conneticut. Bork's "originalist" view proclaimed that Justice Douglas erroneously interpreted the right of privacy from the Constitution. The originalist view is that judges must strictly adhere to the language of the Constitution, thus people do not have a general right to privacy because it was never actually written into the Constitution. This view severely restricts judges in dealing with new issues that our forefathers could not have possibly envisioned. The inability of "originalist" to deal with modern and future problems displays a need for Supreme Court judges to be able to interpret laws from the Constitution. Without this ability it would be doubtful if people today could claim a general right to privacy. The Griswald case involved a bizarre law that forbade the use of condoms in the hope that it would prevent adulterous affairs. This deduction is as absurd as banning all sales of chocolate in order to prevent obesity. Robert Bork admitted that this law did not make sense, especially in the ability of government officials to enforce the law. Yet, Bork disagreed with the method used by Justice Douglas to overturn the conviction of two doctors distributing information on condoms. Bork felt that Douglas's liberal use of penumbras to create a zone of privacy was an excessive use of judicial power. Bork feels a judge must follow the Constitution and should not imply anything from the various ideas in the Constitution. This poses problems when trying to deal with cases that the Constitution does not specifically mention. For example, without the ability to interpret some of the various amendments in the constitution it would be virtually impossible for a judge to decide cases dealing with the on- line world. Is an on-line service provider similar to a magazine publisher (Responsible for the information that it disseminates) or like a bookstore (That is not specifically liable for the information that it disseminates)? These types of decisions cannot be solved with an "originalist" view, because the Constitution did not have the foresight to deal with such issues. In this same manner Justice Douglas implements penumbras to arrive at a general right of privacy that is not explicitly written into the Constitution. These penumbras are all valid within the spirit of the Constitution and does not go against anything specifically forbidden in the document. Thus, the justification of Justice Douglas to create a zone of privacy is legitimate and the old archaic Griswald laws is forever vanquished into the history books. Justice Douglas writes; "Various guarantees create zones of privacy.

Thursday, October 24, 2019

Argument Paper Fast Food Essay

Zinczenko is saying that common sense would say it is personal responsibility to be an active eater and know what you are putting in your mouth. In discussions of fast-food obesity, one controversial issue has been the lack of the nutritional facts. On the one hand people should do research before they eat instead of blaming fast-food places. On the other hand the nutritional facts should be placed on the food itself. In my opinion, personal responsibility should be taken for what you eat because fast-food places are not forcing you to eat their food. For instance common sense says something that is dunked in grease and cooked in five minutes cannot be good for you. Becoming obese from fast-food is the result of no self-control. Grease in itself contains many calories and causes many problems with blood pressure, cholesterol and type two diabetes. Zinczenko states, â€Å"Today According to the National Institutes of Health, type 2 diabetes accounts for at least 30 percent of all new childhood cases of diabetes on this country† (Zinczenko 154). Type 2 diabetes is obesity related and a serious disease. Poulin 2 Common sense tells you eating two meals a day, in a fast-food restaurant, will cause you to gain weight. This unhealthy weight gain tells people that there is a problem to the way they are eating and it is not the washer shrinking their jeans. Instead of walking into McDonalds kids can walk into Subway and try a sandwich that is healthier and cost about the same as the huge meals they can get at McDonalds. There are healthier alternatives that re just as fast and taste as good as burger joints. Although I grant that many people might say there is no way of knowing how many calories are in fast-food meal has because of the lack of nutritional labels, labels are readily available on fast-food websites. The labels would not change the fact that it is personal responsibility to know that something that has been smothered in grease has no nutritional value. On the one hand, I agree with people that labels should be put on fast-food explaining what is in the food. But on the other hand, I still insist that people should do the research if labels are the main concern of nutritional values. Just because people have labels explaining the fat content does not mean they will stop eating the food. This is where personal responsibility needs to come into play. When people find out what really is in the food and the content of fat people need to be active and make the right decision to not add fast-food into their daily diets. Self-control is a huge factor here and people need to take charge, putting themselves in charge of a healthy lifestyle. In the end it is only the consumer who can control what they consume not the companies and blame cannot be put on that one party. Proponents of fast-food restaurants causing obesity are right to argue that the food causes you to gain weight when you eat it regularly, it is cheap, it is easily accessible, and it is catered to children. But they exaggerate when they claim that fast-food is the number one reason for child obesity in the United States. Poulin 3 You can argue that children who sit in front of video games and computers all day long are a huge contributing factor to the obesity rate. Their lack of activity can cause pounds to pile on and that has nothing to do with McDonalds Fast-food. For instance fast-food has always made me feel sick to my stomach. My common sense would tell me that as good as it does taste my body does not like fast-food. When I was younger I gained a lot of weight because I would eat at McDonalds every chance I got. I was unaware that I could be making better choices and choose not to eat it. Kids today are uneducated on how to make healthier choices and live healthier lives with the influences of fast-food. Zinczenko states, â€Å"But most of the teenagers who live, as I once did, on a fast-food diet won’t turn their lives around: They’ve crossed under the golden arches to a likely fate of lifetime obesity† (Zinczenko 154). If the country believes that fast-food is the cause of childhood obesity then why do we still continue to eat it? People need to realize labels are not put on the food because if people really knew what was in the food they would not continue to eat it. Again that is where common sense should tell you that you should not eat fast-food. Although at a first glance People, including young and old, might say that fast-food is the cause of being obese. But on a closer inspection it is really the individuals fault. For example people are so quick to blame fast-food restaurants for making them obese that they jump right to suing the corporation, but are they actually doing something about the obesity. Zinczenko mentions in his article how one meal can contain â€Å"up around 1,040 calories which is half of the government’s recommended daily calorie intake. And that doesn’t take into account the 450-calorie super-size Coke† (Zinczenko 155). The calorie intake should tell anyone that eating this way and especially eating this way twice a day is extremely unhealthy and fattening. People need Poulin 4 to speak up and demand labels. Zinczenko says, â€Å"They would do well to protect themselves, and their customers, by providing the nutrition information people need to make informed choices about their products. Without such warnings, we’ll see more sick, obese children and angrier, litigious parents† (Zinczenko 155). Parents need to be more active in their children’s lives and teach them about healthy life styles that way in the future generations can be much healthier. In conclusion people need to take personal responsibility for their own weight and stop forcing the blame on fast-food corporations. Common sense should tell you that greasy food is not good for you and that it has no nutritional value. Many people can say that labels are the cause of obesity because they are uniformed about what they are eating. Labels are readily available at any fast-food chain and on their websites. People need to speak up and come up with a solution to this issue rather than be part of the problem. Common sense also says that if it is cooked in grease it is a good chance it is covered in fat. People are responsible for their own lives and they need to stop blaming others for their short comings. Ultimately what is at stake here is a healthier generation.

Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Why Farts Are Awesome

People are too uptight. Or maybe people just don't realize how funny farting actually is. And by people, I mean the feminine half of the population. The difference in opinion between the sexes on the humorous value of a good fart is one of the most telling signs that men are far more evolved than women. Or at least have a better sense of humor. Dammit, farts are funny. So what brought this on, you ask? Well today at work, I had to fart. So naturally I ran over to where one of my coworkers was standing, lifted my leg, scrunched my face up, and let ‘er rip. Apparently, that was rude. Well, excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuse me. After I farted on my coworker, every single male working starting laughing their asses off, and the females looked at me as if I'd just committed the most heinous crime one can commit. The manager tried to keep the peace by politely asking me to not fart on people, but it was one of those times where you're trying to tell somebody not to do something, yet you just can't stop laughing. I was forced to admit that farting on someone is rude. Yeah, so? It's also very freakin hilarious. We do it to each other all the time, well, the guys anyway. We'll run over to each other's workstations, rip one off, then run away laughing as the other person covers their nose. Then an hour later they'll get us back. And you know what? It's damn funny too. So of course when I farted on my coworker people asked me if I would think it's funny if someone farted on me. Not especially, but it would be damn funny to them, and if they did it to me and didn't laugh, I'd kick their ass. Of course it isn't funny if you're on the receiving end, but it's comedic gold if you deliver a well-timed stinker to a friend. The humor value of a fart is judged by the level of humor in the eyes of the farter and the third-party audience, if applicable. The fartee's perspective doesn't count. That's the whole point of getting a good laugh at the expense of others. I don't mind if people get a laugh at my expense. It's the rules of the game, you live by the sword and die by the sword. I can take a fart from someone else, but you can bet your ass I'll be delivering one with your name on it. You see, if God didn't want people to fart on each other, he wouldn't have made it so funny. God wants us to fart in the funniest manner possible. Usually that involves assaulting the nasal passages of your fellow man. Farting is just funny. I mean think about it, it stinks, it makes a funny noise, and it comes out of your ass, how could it possibly get any funnier than that? As a matter of fact, I challenge you to name five things in life that are funnier than nailing somebody else with a big stinky fart. I don't think it's possible. To help all of you appreciate the art of farting a little more, I have taken the liberty of coming up with a few farting tips from a farting pro. If possible, make certain someone else gets the pleasure of smelling your fart. A fart nobody else smells or hears is an opportunity wasted and lost forever. If you have to fart and you're standing next to someone, bend your ass and â€Å"aim† toward them. This doesn't really make it any smellier for them, but it adds dramatic effect and makes the experience funnier. If you have to fart, and nobody is standing right next to you, hunt someone down, then lift your leg, scrunch up your face, and let it go. For bonus points, try to corner someone and then fart on them. Also for bonus, get down on your knees as though you're looking for something on the ground. Ask for help. As soon as the good samaritan gets on their knees to help you, quickly move your ass right up next to their face and let go. When someone is giving their opinion and you have to fart, say â€Å"You know what I think about that? † and then scrunch up your face and fart. When you have to fart and someone is walking in your direction, hold the fart until the are directly behind you, then release. If you're sitting down when you fart, lift the ass cheek facing the person nearest to you, that way they get the full effect. Upon completion of the fart, say â€Å"aaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh†, as though you've just taken an eleven-pound shit. Quickly claim the fart as your own handiwork, especially to those who didn't hear it. If you don't tell them, they may never know you just farted. Raise your arms over your head as though you've just won the World Heavyweight Title in front of thousands of people. Announce what it was that made you fart. Make sure to use lots of description. Rather than say â€Å"I need to stop eating so much Mexican food†, say â€Å"God damn, those three bean burritos went right through me, I'll be lucky if I don't get diarrhea. † Describe to all around you how the fart felt as it came out. For example, was it a wet one? A cheek burner? Did you feel like a giant gas bubble in your stomach popped with the fart's release? Do you need to go to the restroom just to make sure a little feces didn't escape as well? Rate the fart. Unless it was a dud, in which case you shouldn't have done all the buildup. But if it was a good one, talk about what a great fart it was and how you wish you'd had a video camera.